• Hertault, A. et al. Comprehensive literature review of radiation levels during endovascular aortic repair in Cathlabs and operating theatres. J. Vasc. Surg. 72, 1505 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kaschwich, M., Matysiak, F., Horn, M. & Kleemann, M. Imaging procedures—Possibilities for reduction of radiation in the operating room. Gefässchirurgie 23, 574–579 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Alkhorayef, M. et al. Staff radiation dose and estimated risk in an interventional radiology department. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 178, 108999 (2021).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Haddadi, G. et al. Investigation of erythema, radiation dose, and radiation-induced apoptosis in the peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients treated with radiofrequency catheter ablation. Iran. J. Med. Phys. 18, 15–22 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zanzonico, P. B., Chu, B. P. & Dauer, L. T. Essential Inquiries: Dose, Benefit, and Risk in Medical Imaging. 1 ed.: CRC Press; 2019, p. 3–17.

  • Sureka, C. S. Carabe-Fernandez, A. & Armpilia, C. Radiation Biology for Medical Physicists. First edition. ed. London: Taylor and Francis; 2017.

  • Guesnier-Dopagne, M. et al. Incidence of chronic radiodermatitis after fluoroscopically guided interventions: A retrospective study. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 30, 692–8.e13 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Jaschke, W., Bartal, G., Martin, C. J. & Vano, E. Unintended and accidental exposures, significant dose events and trigger levels in interventional radiology. Cardiovasc. Interv. Radiol. 43, 1114–1121 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Catto V, Stronati G, Porro B, et al. Cardiac arrhythmia catheter ablation procedures guided by x-ray imaging: N-acetylcysteine protection against radiation-induced cellular damage (CARAPACE study): Study design. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020.

  • Samei, E., Peck, D. J. & Hendee, W. R. Hendee’s Physics of Medical Imaging. Fifth edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2019.

  • Rehani, M. M. et al. ICRP Publication 117. Radiological protection in fluoroscopically guided procedures performed outside the imaging department. Ann. ICRP 40, 1–102 (2010).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Measurements NCRP. 1.4 Radiation Quantities Used in This Report. NCRP Report No 180—Management of Exposure to Ionizing Radiation—Radiation Protection Guidance for the United States. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements p. 11.

  • Schueler, B. A., Fetterly, K. A. & Balter, S. Radiation safety during cardiovascular procedures. In Textbook of Interventional Cardiology 8th edn (eds Topol, E. & Teirstein, P.) 128–138 (Elsevier, Philadelphia, 2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Eagan, J. T. Jr., Jones, C. T. & Roubin, G. S. Interventional cardiologists: Beware and be aware: An updated report of radiation-induced cutaneous cancers. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 91, 475–477 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Rajaraman, P. et al. Cancer risks in U.S. radiologic technologists working with fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures, 1994–2008. Am. J. Roentgenol. 206, 1101–9 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Roguin, A., Goldstein, J., Bar, O. & Goldstein, J. A. Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures. Am. J. Cardiol. 111, 1368–1372 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Shafiee, M., Borzoueisileh, S., Rashidfar, R., Dehghan, M. & Jaafarian, S. Z. Chromosomal aberrations in C-arm fluoroscopy, CT-scan, lithotripsy, and digital radiology staff. Mutat. Res./Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 849, 503131 (2020).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • El-Sayed, T. et al. Radiation-induced DNA damage in operators performing endovascular aortic repair. Circulation 136, 2406–2416 (2017).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Andreassi, M. et al. Subclinical carotid atherosclerosis and early vascular aging from long-term low-dose ionizing radiation exposure: A genetic, telomere, and vascular ultrasound study in cardiac catheterization laboratory staff. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 8, 616–627 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Rajabi, A. B. et al. Ionizing radiation-induced cataract in interventional cardiology staff. Res Cardiovasc Med. 4, e25148 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ciraj-Bjelac, O. et al. Eye lens exposure to medical staff performing electrophysiology procedures: Dose assessment and correlation to patient dose. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 172, 475–482 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Crowhurst, J. A. et al. Factors contributing to radiation dose for patients and operators during diagnostic cardiac angiography. J. Med. Radiat. Sci. 66, 20–29 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kim, J.-S. et al. Occupational radiation exposure in femoral artery approach is higher than radial artery approach during coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. Sci. Rep. 10, 7104 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Roh, Y. et al. Radiation exposure of interventional cardiologists during coronary angiography: evaluation by phantom measurement and computer simulation. Australas Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 43, 1279–1287 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Stierlin, F., Ryck, N., Cook, S. & Goy, J.-J. Radiation exposure in transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedure. In Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Springer; 2019. p. 407–16.

  • Shatila, O. H. Occupational Radiation Dose During the Trans-catheter Aortic Valve Replacement Procedure (Colorado State University, Fort Collins, 2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Sciahbasi, A. et al. Radiation dose among different cardiac and vascular invasive procedures: The RODEO study. Int. J. Cardiol. 240, 92–96 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Madder, R. D. et al. Radiation exposure among scrub technologists and nurse circulators during cardiac catheterization. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 11, 206–212 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Refahiyat, L., Van Oosterhout, S., Pageau, S., Parker, J. L. & Madder, R. D. Patient body mass index and occupational radiation doses to circulating nurses during coronary angiography. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020.

  • Miyake, H. et al. Medical electrical equipment – part 2–43: particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of X-ray equipment for interventional procedures. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi. 67, 298–301 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • IEC. Medical electrical equipment—Part 2–43: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of X-ray equipment for interventional procedures. In: International Electrotechnical Commission; 2019. p. 272.

  • Lin, P. J. P. et al. Accuracy and calibration of integrated radiation output indicators in diagnostic radiology: A report of the AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 190. Med. Phys. 42, 6815–6829 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • IRPA. IRPA Guidance on Implementation of Eye Dose Monitoring and Eye Protection of Workers. International Radiation Protection Association, 2017.

  • Principi, S. et al. The influence of operator position, height and body orientation on eye lens dose in interventional radiology and cardiology: Monte Carlo simulations versus realistic clinical measurements. Phys. Med. 32, 1111–1117 (2016).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Reeves, R. R. et al. Invasive cardiologists are exposed to greater left sided cranial radiation: The BRAIN Study (brain radiation exposure and attenuation during invasive cardiology procedures). JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 8, 1197–1206 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Buytaert, D. et al. Combining optimized image processing with dual axis rotational angiography: Toward low-dose invasive coronary angiography. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 9, e14683 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Vanhavere, F. et al. The use of active personal dosemeters in interventional workplaces in hospitals: comparison between active and passive dosemeters worn simultaneously by medical staff. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 188, 22–29 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Harrysson H. DoseAware base station package user manual. In: Healthcare P, (ed.). 2010.

  • Struelens, L. et al. Use of active personal dosemeters in interventional radiology and cardiology: Tests in hospitals—ORAMED project. Radiat. Meas. 46, 1258–1261 (2011).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sanchez, R. M. et al. High filtration in interventional practices reduces patient radiation doses but not always scatter radiation doses. Br. J. Radiol. 94, 20200774 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Omar, A. et al. Assessment of the occupational eye lens dose for clinical staff in interventional radiology, cardiology and neuroradiology. J. Radiol. Prot. 37, 145–159 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • The 2007 Recommendations of the ICRP. Publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007; p. 1–332.

  • BS EN ISO 15382:2017: Radiological protection. In Procedures for Monitoring the Dose to the Lens of the Eye, the Skin and the Extremities. British Standards Institute, 2017.

  • Implications for Occupational Radiation Protection of the New Dose Limit for the Lens of the Eye. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2014.

  • Principi, S. et al. Influence of dosemeter position for the assessment of eye lens dose during interventional cardiology. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 164, 79–83 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Dawson, J. & Haulon, S. Radiation physics and biological effects of radiation in vascular surgery. In Mechanisms of Vascular Disease: A Textbook for Vascular Specialists (ed. Fitridge, R.) 671–694 (Springer International Publishing, 2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Crowhurst, J. A. et al. Radiation dose in coronary angiography and intervention: initial results from the establishment of a multi-centre diagnostic reference level in Queensland public hospitals. J. Med. Radiat. Sci. 61, 135–141 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Mattar, E., Alsafi, K., Sulieman, A. & Suliman, I. I. Occupational exposure of the operator eye lens in digital coronary angiography and interventions. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 165, 108400 (2019).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kloeze, C. et al. Editor’s choice: Use of disposable radiation-absorbing surgical drapes results in significant dose reduction during EVAR procedures. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 47, 268–272 (2014).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sailer, A. M. et al. Occupational radiation exposure during endovascular aortic repair. Cardiovasc. Interv. Radiol. 38, 827–832 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kirkwood, M. L. et al. Surgeon radiation dose during complex endovascular procedures. J. Vasc. Surg. 62, 457–463 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Timaran, L. I. et al. Dual fluoroscopy with live-image digital zooming significantly reduces patient and operating staff radiation during fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J. Vasc. Surg. 73, 601–607 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Sánchez, R. M., Vano, E., Fidalgo, J. & Fernández, J. M. Percutaneous structural cardiology: Are anaesthesiologists properly protected from ionising radiation?. J. Radiol. Prot. 40, 1420–1428 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Sauren, L. D., van Garsse, L., van Ommen, V. & Kemerink, G. J. Occupational radiation dose during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 78, 770–776 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wilson-Stewart, K., Hartel, G. & Fontanarosa, D. Occupational radiation exposure to the head is higher for scrub nurses than cardiologists during cardiac angiography. J. Adv. Nurs. 75, 2692–2700 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Omar, A., Marteinsdottir, M., Kadesjo, N. & Fransson, A. On the feasibility of utilizing active personal dosimeters worn on the chest to estimate occupational eye lens dose in x-ray angiography. J. Radiol. Prot. 35, 271–284 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wilson-Stewart, K., Shanahan, M., Fontanarosa, D. & Davidson, R. Occupational radiation exposure to nursing staff during cardiovascular fluoroscopic procedures: A review of the literature. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 19, 282–297 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wilson-Stewart, K. et al. Occupational and patient radiation dose and quality implications of femoral access imaging during coronary angiography. J. Multidiscip. Healthc. 14, 1807–1818 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • James, R. F. et al. Analysis of occupational radiation exposure during cerebral angiography utilizing a new real time radiation dose monitoring system. J. Neurointerv. Surg. 7, 503–508 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wilson-Stewart, K. S. et al. Taller staff occupationally exposed to less radiation to the temple in cardiac procedures, but risk higher doses during vascular cases. Sci. Rep. 10, 16103 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sailer, A. M., Paulis, L., Vergoossen, L., Wildberger, J. E. & Jeukens, C. R. L. Optimizing staff dose in fluoroscopy-guided interventions by comparing clinical data with phantom experiments. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 30, 701–8.e1 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lopez, P. O. et al. ICRP Publication 139: Occupational radiological protection in interventional procedures. Ann. ICRP. 47, 1–118 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Horn, M., Goltz, J. P., Stahlberg, E., Papenberg, N., Ernst, F. & Kleemann, M. Endovascular interventions proceeded under contrast agent and radiation sparing using navigation and imaging techniques for holographic visualisation. In European Symposium on Vascular Biomaterials, Strasbourg. 2017.

  • Ahmad, W., Obeidi, Y., Majd, P. & Brunkwall, J. S. The 2D–3D registration method in image fusion is accurate and helps to reduce the used contrast medium, radiation, and procedural time in standard EVAR procedures. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 51, 177–186 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Maurel, B. et al. A prospective observational trial of fusion imaging in infrarenal aneurysms. J. Vasc. Surg. 68, 1706–13.e1 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Faroux, L. et al. Radiation exposure during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Impact of arterial approach and prosthesis type. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 111, 1601–1606 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • link

    By admin

    https://muehlenbar.de/wp-includes/slot-online/

    https://the-chef.co/sbobet/

    Slot Gacor Terbaru

    Link Slot Gacor

    Sbobet

    Situs Slot Gacor

    Slot Gacor 2022

    Login Sbobet

    Daftar Sbobet

    https://www.dcosmeticclinics.com.au/wp-includes/sbobet/

    https://thetastesoflife.com/wp-includes/sbobet/

    https://www.townshipofsugargrove.com/wp-includes/slot-gacor/

    https://texasmamaboutique.com/wp-includes/slot-gacor/

    https://bizu-me.com/wp-includes/slot-gacor/

    https://tiketa.co.za/wp-includes/slot-gacor/

    situs slot gacor

    slot gacor gampang menang

    slot gacor terbaru

    daftar sbobet

    slot bonus newmember

    link sbobet

    sbobet login