Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(5):1570–95.
Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 2011;124(23):2574–609.
Du Rand IA, Blaikley J, Booton R, et al. British Thoracic Society guideline for diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy in adults: accredited by NICE. Thorax. 2013;68(Suppl 1):i1–44.
Chen SC, Rex DK. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(4):856–61.
Doll JA, Dai D, Roe MT, et al. Assessment of Operator Variability in Risk-Standardized Mortality Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report From the NCDR. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(7):672–82.
Fracchia M, Senore C, Armaroli P, et al. Assessment of the multiple components of the variability in the adenoma detection rate in sigmoidoscopy screening, and lessons for training. Endoscopy. 2010;42(6):448–55.
Fanaroff AC, Zakroysky P, Dai D, et al. Outcomes of PCI in Relation to Procedural Characteristics and Operator Volumes in the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(24):2913–24.
Cohen J, Pike IM. Defining and measuring quality in endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(1):46–7.
Faulx AL, Lightdale JR, Acosta RD, et al. Guidelines for privileging, credentialing, and proctoring to perform GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85(2):273–81.
Harold JG, Bass TA, Bashore TM, et al. ACCF/AHA/SCAI 2013 update of the clinical competence statement on coronary artery interventional procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training (Writing Committee to Revise the 2007 Clinical Competence Statement on Cardiac Interventional Procedures). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(4):357–96.
Kreutzer L, Hu YY, Stulberg J, Greenberg CC, Bilimoria KY, Johnson JK. Formative Evaluation of a Peer Video-Based Coaching Initiative. J Surg Res. 2021;257:169–77.
Prabhu KM, Don C, Sayre GG, et al. Interventional Cardiologists’ Perceptions of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Quality Measurement and Feedback. Am Heart J. 2021;235:97–103.
Adler DG, Bakis G, Coyle WJ, et al. Principles of training in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75(2):231–5.
King SB 3rd, Babb JD, Bates ER, et al. COCATS 4 Task Force 10: Training in Cardiac Catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(17):1844–53.
Lee HJ, Corbetta L. Training in interventional pulmonology: the European and US perspective. Eur Respir Rev. 2021;30(160):200025.
Ijioma NN, Don C, Arora V, et al. ACGME Interventional Cardiology milestones 2.0-an overview: Endorsed by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;99(3):777–85.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372: n71.
Center for Evidence-Based Medicine. Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine: Levels of Evidence (March 2009). Published 2009. 2021. https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/oxford-centre-for-evidence-based-medicine-levels-of-evidence-march-2009?09dd47dc-0e93-11ed-9dd4-0a25ac88ed16. Accessed 8 Dec 2021.
Vaidya A, Aydin A, Ridgley J, Raison N, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Current Status of Technical Skills Assessment Tools in Surgery: A Systematic Review. J Surg Res. 2020;246:342–78.
Downing SM. Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ. 2003;37(9):830–7.
Duloy AM, Kaltenbach TR, Keswani RN. Assessing colon polypectomy competency and its association with established quality metrics. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(3):635–44.
Duloy AM, Kaltenbach TR, Wood M, Gregory DL, Keswani RN. Colon polypectomy report card improves polypectomy competency: results of a prospective quality improvement study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89(6):1212–21.
Fleischer DE, al-Kawas F, Benjamin S, Lewis JH, Kidwell J. Prospective evaluation of complications in an endoscopy unit: use of the A/S/G/E quality care guidelines. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;38(4):411–4.
Gupta S, Anderson J, Bhandari P, et al. Development and validation of a novel method for assessing competency in polypectomy: direct observation of polypectomy skills. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73(6):1232-1239.e1232.
Gupta S, Bassett P, Man R, Suzuki N, Vance ME, Thomas-Gibson S. Validation of a novel method for assessing competency in polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75(3):568–75.
Keswani RN, Benson M, Beveridge C, et al. Colonoscopy-Naïve Raters Can Be Trained to Assess Colonoscopy Quality. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(4):989-991.e981.
Lee RH, Tang RS, Muthusamy VR, et al. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(1):128–34.
Mai HD, Sanowski RA, Waring JP. Improved patient care using the A/S/G/E guidelines on quality assurance: a prospective comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37(6):597–9.
Patel SG, Duloy A, Kaltenbach T, et al. Development and validation of a video-based cold snare polypectomy assessment tool (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89(6):1222-1230.e1222.
Rex DK. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51(1):33–6.
Rex DK, Hewett DG, Raghavendra M, Chalasani N. The impact of videorecording on the quality of colonoscopy performance: a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(11):2312–7.
Sapienza PE, Levine GM, Pomerantz S, Davidson JH, Weinryb J, Glassman J. Impact of a quality assurance program on gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastroenterology. 1992;102(2):387–93.
Scaffidi MA, Grover SC, Carnahan H, et al. A prospective comparison of live and video-based assessments of colonoscopy performance. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(3):766–75.
Shah SG, Thomas-Gibson S, Brooker JC, et al. Use of video and magnetic endoscope imaging for rating competence at colonoscopy: validation of a measurement tool. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(4):568–73.
Takao M, Bilgic E, Kaneva P, et al. Development and validation of an endoscopic submucosal dissection video assessment tool. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(6):2671–8.
Thomas-Gibson S, Rogers PA, Suzuki N, et al. Development of a video assessment scoring method to determine the accuracy of endoscopist performance at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Endoscopy. 2006;38(3):218–25.
Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Poulose BK, et al. Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES): a valid measurement tool for technical skills in flexible endoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(8):1834–41.
Walsh CM, Ling SC, Khanna N, et al. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Competency Assessment Tool: reliability and validity evidence. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(6):1417-1424.e1412.
Barton JR, Corbett S, van der Vleuten CP. The validity and reliability of a Direct Observation of Procedural Skills assessment tool: assessing colonoscopic skills of senior endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75(3):591–7.
Boyle E, Al-Akash M, Patchett S, Traynor O, McNamara D. Towards continuous improvement of endoscopy standards: validation of a colonoscopy assessment form. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(9):1126–31.
Sarker SK, Albrani T, Zaman A, Patel B. Procedural performance in gastrointestinal endoscopy: an assessment and self-appraisal tool. Am J Surg. 2008;196(3):450–5.
Doll JA, Overton R, Patel MR, et al. Morbidity and Mortality Conference for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10(8):e003538.
Doll JA, Plomondon ME, Waldo SW. Characteristics of the Quality Improvement Content of Cardiac Catheterization Peer Reviews in the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(8): e198393.
Blows LH, Dixon GF, Behan MW, et al. Prospective peer review of regional percutaneous interventional procedures: a tool for quality control and revalidation. EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2012;8(8):939–44.
Puri P, Carroll J, Patterson B. Cost Savings Associated With Implementation of Peer-Reviewed Appropriate Use Criteria for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117(8):1289–93.
Räder SB, Abildgaard U, Jørgensen E, Bech B, Lönn L, Ringsted CV. Association between endovascular performance in a simulated setting and in the catheterization laboratory. Simul Healthc. 2014;9(4):241–8.
Konge L, Larsen KR, Clementsen P, Arendrup H, von Buchwald C, Ringsted C. Reliable and valid assessment of clinical bronchoscopy performance. Respiration. 2012;83(1):53–60.
Konge L, Vilmann P, Clementsen P, Annema JT, Ringsted C. Reliable and valid assessment of competence in endoscopic ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer. Endoscopy. 2012;44(10):928–33.
Konge L, Clementsen PF, Ringsted C, Minddal V, Larsen KR, Annema JT. Simulator training for endobronchial ultrasound: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Respir J. 2015;46(4):1140–9.
Caruso M, DiRoberto C, Howe J Jr, Baccei SJ. How to Effectively Implement a Peer Review Process for Interventional Radiology Procedures. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR. 2016;13(9):1106–8.
d’Othée BJ, Haskal ZJ. Interventional radiology peer, a newly developed peer-review scoring system designed for interventional radiology practice. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(10):1481-1486.e1481.
Luo M, Berkowitz S, Nguyen Q, et al. Electronic IR Group Peer Review and Learning Performed during Daily Clinical Rounds. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30(4):594–600.
Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(14):1298–306.
Orlander JD, Barber TW, Fincke BG. The morbidity and mortality conference: the delicate nature of learning from error. Acad Med. 2002;77(10):1001–6.
Xiong X, Johnson T, Jayaraman D, McDonald EG, Martel M, Barkun AN. At the Crossroad with Morbidity and Mortality Conferences: Lessons Learned through a Narrative Systematic Review. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2016:7679196.
Orlander JD, Fincke BG. Morbidity and mortality conference: a survey of academic internal medicine departments. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(8):656–8.
Watanabe Y, Bilgic E, Lebedeva E, et al. A systematic review of performance assessment tools for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(3):832–44.
Greenberg CC, Byrnes ME, Engler TA, Quamme SPR, Thumma JR, Dimick JB. Association of a Statewide Surgical Coaching Program With Clinical Outcomes and Surgeon Perceptions. Ann Surg. 2021;273(6):1034–9.
Hunt JL. Assessing physician competency: an update on the joint commission requirement for ongoing and focused professional practice evaluation. Adv Anat Pathol. 2012;19(6):388–400.
Horsley T, Lockyer J, Cogo E, Zeiter J, Bursey F, Campbell C. National programmes for validating physician competence and fitness for practice: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2016;6(4): e010368.
Khan R, Zheng E, Wani SB, et al. Colonoscopy competence assessment tools: a systematic review of validity evidence. Endoscopy. 2021;53(12):1235–45.
link