• Horton RH, Lucassen AM. Recent developments in genetic/genomic medicine. Clin Sci. 2019;133:697–708.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Naidoo N, Pawitan Y, Soong R, Cooper DN, Ku C-S. Human genetics and genomics a decade after the release of the draft sequence of the human genome. Hum Genomics. 2011;5:577.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Long JC, Debono D, Williams R, Salisbury E, O’Neill S, Eykman E, et al. Using behaviour change and implementation science to address low referral rates in oncology. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:904.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Backman J, Chang Z, Carroll S, Einstein MH. Referrals to genetic counseling in patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, an institutional review. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;139:586.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Samimi G, Bernardini MQ, Brody LC, Caga-Anan CF, Campbell IG, Chenevix-Trench G, et al. Traceback: a proposed framework to increase identification and genetic counseling of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers through family-based outreach. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:2329.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McClatchey T, Lay E, Strassberg M, Van den Veyver IB. Missed opportunities: unidentified genetic risk factors in prenatal care. Prenat Diagn. 2018;38:75–79.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ruiter JS, Berkenbosch-Nieuwhof K, Van Den Berg MP, Van Dijk R, Middel B, Van, Tintelen JP. The importance of the family history in caring for families with long QT syndrome and dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Med Genet A. 2010;152:607–612.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dragojlovic N, Borle K, Kopac N, Ellis U, Birch P, Adam S, et al. The composition and capacity of the clinical genetics workforce in high-income countries: a scoping review. Genet Med. 2020;22:1437–1449.

  • Delikurt T, Williamson GR, Anastasiadou V, Skirton H. A systematic review of factors that act as barriers to patient referral to genetic services. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015;23:739–745.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Collins V, Halliday J, Williamson R. What predicts the use of genetic counseling services after the birth of a child with Down syndrome? J Genet Couns. 2003;12:43–60.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Beene-Harris RY, Wang C, Bach JV. Barriers to access: results from focus groups to identify genetic service needs in the community. Public Health Genomics. 2007;10:10–18.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Aalfs CM, Smets EM, de Haes HC, Leschot NJ. Referral for genetic counselling during pregnancy: limited alertness and awareness about genetic risk factors among GPs. Fam Pract. 2003;20:135–141.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Koil CE, Everett JN, Hoechstetter L, Ricer RE, Huelsman KM. Differences in physician referral practices and attitudes regarding hereditary breast cancer by clinical practice location. Genet Med. 2003;5:364–369.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dyson J, Lawton R, Jackson C, Cheater F. Does the use of a theoretical approach tell us more about hand hygiene behaviour? The barriers and levers to hand hygiene. J Infect Prev. 2011;12:17–24.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Eldh AC, Almost J, DeCorby-Watson K, Gifford W, Harvey G, Hasson H, et al. Clinical interventions, implementation interventions, and the potential greyness in between-a discussion paper. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:1–10.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Davidoff F, Dixon-Woods M, Leviton L, Michie S. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24:228–238.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Michie S, Carey RN, Johnston M, Rothman AJ, De Bruin M, Kelly MP, et al. From theory-inspired to theory-based interventions: A protocol for developing and testing a methodology for linking behaviour change techniques to theoretical mechanisms of action. Ann Behav Med. 2018;52:501–512.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Davies P, Walker AE, Grimshaw JM. A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations. Implement Sci. 2010;5:14.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Taylor N, Healey E, Morrow A, Greening S, Wakefield CE, Warwick L, et al. Aligning intuition and theory: enhancing the replicability of behaviour change interventions in cancer genetics. Implement Sci Commun. 2020;1:1–10.

  • Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38:65–76.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.

  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR, Eldridge S, Grandes G, Griffiths CJ, et al. Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) statement. BMJ. 2017;356:i6795.

  • Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.

  • Phillips CJ, Marshall AP, Chaves NJ, Jankelowitz SK, Lin IB, Loy CT, et al. Experiences of using the Theoretical Domains Framework across diverse clinical environments: a qualitative study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2015;8:139.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015;10:21.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46:81–95.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Michie S, Prestwich A. Are interventions theory-based? Development of a theory coding scheme. Health Psychol. 2010;29:1.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Johnston M, Carey RN, Connell Bohlen LE, Johnston DW, Rothman AJ, de Bruin M, et al. Development of an online tool for linking behavior change techniques and mechanisms of action based on triangulation of findings from literature synthesis and expert consensus. Transl Behav Med. 2021;11:1049–1065.

  • Kmet LM, Lee RC, Cook LS. Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. Retreived from http://www.ihe.ca/documents/HTA-FR13.pdf. 2004.

  • Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:401–406.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bednar EM, Sun CC, Camacho B, Terrell J, Rieber AG, Ramondetta LM, et al. Disseminating universal genetic testing to a diverse, indigent patient population at a county hospital gynecologic oncology clinic. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;152:328–333.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bednar EM, Oakley HD, Sun CC, Burke CC, Munsell MF, Westin SN, et al. A universal genetic testing initiative for patients with high-grade, non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer and the implications for cancer treatment. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;146:399–404.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dekker N, Hermens RP, de Wilt JH, van Zelst-Stams WA, Hoogerbrugge N, RISCO study group. Improving recognition and referral of patients with an increased familial risk of colorectal cancer: results from a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis. 2015;17:499–510.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Scheuner MT, Hamilton AB, Peredo J, Sale TJ, Austin C, Gilman SC, et al. A cancer genetics toolkit improves access to genetic services through documentation and use of the family history by primary-care clinicians. Genet Med. 2014;16:60–69.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Swanson CL, Kumar A, Maharaj JM, Kemppainen JL, Thomas BC, Weinhold MR, et al. Increasing genetic counseling referral rates through bundled interventions after ovarian cancer diagnosis. Gynecol Oncol. 2018;149:121–126.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wilson BJ, Torrance N, Mollison J, Watson MS, Douglas A, Miedzybrodzka Z, et al. Cluster randomized trial of a multifaceted primary care decision-support intervention for inherited breast cancer risk. Fam Pract. 2006;23:537–544.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cohen SA, Laurino M, Bowen DJ, Upton MP, Pritchard C, Hisama F, et al. Initiation of universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer patients as a model for the implementation of genetic information into clinical oncology practice. Cancer. 2016;122:393–401.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Edelman EA, Lin BK, Doksum T, Drohan B, Edelson V, Dolan SM, et al. Implementation of an electronic genomic and family health history tool in primary prenatal care. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2014;166:34–44.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Eichmeyer JN, Burnham C, Sproat P, Tivis R, Beck TM. The value of a genetic counselor: improving identification of cancer genetic counseling patients with chart review. J Genet Couns. 2014;23:323–329.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cohen SA, McIlvried DE. Improving access with a collaborative approach to cancer genetic counseling services: a pilot study. Community Oncol. 2013;10:227–234.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Emery J, Morris H, Goodchild R, Fanshawe T, Prevost AT, Bobrow M, et al. The GRAIDS trial: A cluster randomised controlled trial of computer decision support for the management of familial cancer risk in primary care. Br J Cancer. 2007;97:486–493.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kallenberg FGJ, Aalfs CM, The FO, Wientjes CA, Depla AC, Mundt MW, et al. Evaluation of an online family history tool for identifying hereditary and familial colorectal cancer. Fam Cancer. 2018;17:371–380.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Graff SL, Holder JM, Sears LE, Kurbegov D. Increase in genetic counseling and testing referrals after breast cancer pathway implementation. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020;16:e1481–e8.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Westwood G, Pickering R, Latter S, Little P, Gerard K, Lucassen A, et al. A primary care specialist genetics service: a cluster-randomised factorial trial. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62:e191–e7.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Spinosa D, Acosta T, Wong J, Kurtovic K, Mewshaw J, Collins S, et al. Universal screening for Lynch syndrome in uterine cancer patients: a quality improvement initiative. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;160:169–174.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Koeneman MM, Kruse AJ, Sep SJS, Gubbels CS, Slangen BFM, Van Gorp T, et al. A family history questionnaire improves detection of women at risk for hereditary gynecologic cancer: a pilot study. Fam Cancer. 2014;13:469–475.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Miesfeldt S, Feero WG, Lucas FL, Rasmussen K. Association of patient navigation with care coordination in an Lynch syndrome screening program. Transl Behav Med. 2018;8:450–455.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brown J, Athens A, Tait DL, Crane EK, Higgins RV, Naumann RW, et al. A comprehensive program enabling effective delivery of regional genetic counseling. Int J Gynecological Cancer. 2018;28:996–1002.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kessels K, Eisinger JD, Letteboer TG, Offerhaus GJA, Siersema PD, Moons LMG. Sending family history questionnaires to patients before a colonoscopy improves genetic counseling for hereditary colorectal cancer. J Digest Dis. 2017;18:343–348.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cohen PA, Nichols CB, Schofield L, Van Der Werf S, Pachter N. Impact of clinical genetics attendance at a gynecological oncology tumor board on referrals for genetic counseling and BRCA mutation testing. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016;26:892–897.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Heald B, Plesec T, Liu X, Burke CA, Kalady MF, Church J, et al. Implementation of institutional MSI and IHC testing for diagnosis of Lynch syndrome: the Cleveland Clinic experience. Fam Cancer. 2013;12:784–785.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kishan AU, Gomez CL, Dawson NA, Dvorak R, Foster NM, Hoyt A, et al. Increasing appropriate BRCA1/2 mutation testing: the role of family history documentation and genetic counseling in a multidisciplinary clinic. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23 Suppl 5:634–641.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pederson HJ, Hussain N, Noss R, Yanda C, O’Rourke C, Eng C, et al. Impact of an embedded genetic counselor on breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;169:43–46.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rana HQ, Kipnis L, Hehir K, Cronin A, Jaung T, Stokes SM, et al. Embedding a genetic counselor into oncology clinics improves testing rates and timeliness for women with ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;160:457–463.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Senter L, O’Malley DM, Backes FJ, Copeland LJ, Fowler JM, Salani R, et al. Genetic consultation embedded in a gynecologic oncology clinic improves compliance with guideline-based care. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;147:110–114.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moss CA, Cojocaru E, Hanwell J, Ward S, Xu W, van Zyl M, et al. Multidisciplinary interventions in a specialist Drug Development Unit to improve family history documentation and onward referral of patients with advanced cancer to cancer genetics services. Eur J Cancer. 2019;114:97–106.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Doe S, Petersen S, Swain M. Utilization of genetic testing in breast cancer treatment after implementation of comprehensive multi‐disciplinary care. Breast J. 2020;26:911–916.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Helsper CW, Van Vliet LM, Velthuizen ME, De Wit NJ, Beijaert RPH, Butter E, et al. Identifying patients with a history of ovarian cancer for referral for genetic counselling: non-randomised comparison of two case-finding strategies in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2018;68:e750–e6.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Clyman JC, Nazir F, Tarolli S, Black E, Lombardi RQ, Higgins JJ. The impact of a genetics education program on physicians’ knowledge and genetic counseling referral patterns. Med Teach. 2007;29:e143–e50.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Overbeek L, Hermens R, Van Krieken J, Adang E, Casparie M, Nagengast F, et al. Electronic reminders for pathologists promote recognition of patients at risk for Lynch syndrome: cluster-randomised controlled trial. Virchows Arch. 2010;456:653–659.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Paul JL, Leslie H, Trainer AH, Gaff C. A theory-informed systematic review of clinicians’ genetic testing practices. Eur J Hum Genet. 2018;26:1401–1416.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Roberts MC, Kennedy AE, Chambers DA, Khoury MJ. The current state of implementation science in genomic medicine: opportunities for improvement. Genet Med. 2017;19:858–863.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meissner HI, Glasgow RE, Vinson CA, Chambers D, Brownson RC, Green LW, et al. The US training institute for dissemination and implementation research in health. Implement Sci. 2013;8:1–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Morrow A, Chan P, Tiernan G, Steinberg J, Debono D, Wolfenden L, et al. Building capacity from within: qualitative evaluation of a training program aimed at upskilling healthcare workers in delivering an evidence-based implementation approach. Transl Behav Med. 2021.

  • Morrow A, Hogden E, Kang Y-J, Steinberg J, Canfell K, Solomon MJ, et al. Comparing theory and non-theory based implementation approaches to improving referral practices in cancer genetics: a cluster randomised trial protocol. Trials. 2019;20:1–12.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • White S, Jacobs C, Phillips J. Mainstreaming genetics and genomics: a systematic review of the barriers and facilitators for nurses and physicians in secondary and tertiary care. Genet Med. 2020:22:1149–1155.

  • Albano MG, Jourdain P, De Andrade V, Domenke A, Desnos M, d’Ivernois J-F. Therapeutic patient education in heart failure: do studies provide sufficient information about the educational programme? Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;107:328–339.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J. Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ. 2006;332:413–416.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kirk MA, Moore JE, Stirman SW, Birken SA. Towards a comprehensive model for understanding adaptations’ impact: the model for adaptation design and impact (MADI). Implement Sci. 2020;15:1–15.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Morrow A, Parkinson B, Kang Y-J, Hogden E, Canfell K, Taylor N. The health and economic impact of implementation strategies for improving detection of hereditary cancer patients—protocol for an in-depth cost-effectiveness evaluation with microsimulation modelling. Implement Sci Commun. 2020;1:1–12.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Petzel SV, Vogel RI, McNiel J, Leininger A, Argenta PA, Geller MA. Improving referral for genetic risk assessment in ovarian cancer using an electronic medical record system. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24:1003–1009.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • link

    By admin

    https://muehlenbar.de/wp-includes/slot-online/

    https://the-chef.co/sbobet/

    Slot Gacor Terbaru

    Link Slot Gacor

    Sbobet

    Situs Slot Gacor

    Slot Gacor 2022

    Login Sbobet

    Daftar Sbobet

    https://www.dcosmeticclinics.com.au/wp-includes/sbobet/

    https://thetastesoflife.com/wp-includes/sbobet/

    https://www.townshipofsugargrove.com/wp-includes/slot-gacor/

    https://texasmamaboutique.com/wp-includes/slot-gacor/

    https://bizu-me.com/wp-includes/slot-gacor/

    https://tiketa.co.za/wp-includes/slot-gacor/

    situs slot gacor

    slot gacor gampang menang

    slot gacor terbaru

    daftar sbobet

    slot bonus newmember

    link sbobet

    sbobet login